Thread:Superdadsuper/@comment-1777104-20150829233213/@comment-5175866-20150830011848

I just expected the section to be a bit different in general. It seems that you and other editors have been pushing the article more to a slightly different direction, then what I would've incorporated the article as sort of the midpoint between the specific book articles, and the overall testament articles. The book article talks about authorship, theme, etc for that book, the testament articles should talk about how that whole testament of the Bible fits with each other. The Bible article talks about the Bible as a whole, and section articles talk about the section.

The recongition of the canoncity of the Bible didn't occur within biblical times, so within the biblical point of view I would want to limit the arguments or reasons for why the Bible is canon the way it is directly in the article. Rather just consitutent the Bible itself was inspired by God and then you assume that the canon was also inspired by God. In a sense its impossible to completely remove of any of the modern/present conditions of the Bible that fall outside of biblical times. The goal is to try to keep it as true to as when the Bible was complete as possible.