Board Thread:Community Discusson/@comment-5175866-20160327030142/@comment-1777104-20160407014813

The heading of "Name" is sort of redundant, for that is given in the titles and in the first line of the summrary. The heading of "Etymology" need only be used if such a word study is necessary. If you want totally conformity to formatting, then any etymological remarks should fall in the first line of the actual biological information. For a person, this would help in understanding the situation at birth, for names are either used to honor a family member or, in the early days especially, to describe the situation into which the person was born.

I do not think anything should be change on a global scale. If anything, such a feature should be up to the descretion of the editor. However, I don't think it should be tacked on the end of an article (I've seen some articles where this was done). If the name has a useful meaning, it should be near the front of the article.