Thread:Snowstripe the Fierce/@comment-31246436-20161022130521/@comment-5175866-20161022140627

Thank you for posting this AChild.

@ Snowstripe- I saw this article being posted last night, but was on my mobile device so I decided to wait to take action in order that I may give you a proper message and explanation.

There isn't any proof that there is a separate John of Patmos. AChild has brought some excellent evidence to the table of why Revelation was written by John. Most sources that cite a separate John of Patmos say Revelation would've been pseudonymic like many other apocalyptic works at the time (thus not God-inspired). We can trust that it is indeed a part of the Bible, because of its consistency with the rest of the Bible and evidence for John the Apostle's authorship.

Even if there was a separate John, there still isn't any proof that can support this. I do understand that your article was well-intended though. I am going to delete and redirect the article hopefully that you have the understanding that there's no evidence for a separate John (other than saying Revelation was a fake).

In Christ,

Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator & Bureaucrat