Thread:Superdadsuper/@comment-1777104-20151130020148/@comment-5175866-20151130022623

I think on the Bible article, that is has a lot of sections to introduce, but many of them are lacking biblical evidence, or take place within a biblical timeframe. Those verses I found were examples of that quality of the Bible. The difficult thing (perhaps we can discuss this privately in our chat more) is when use verses in a "sword-like" manner, and use them to reference and cite and not in the whole context. I think when giving examples or stating facts, the Bible is very well meant to be something to be quoted, but when discussing specific accounts the context must be kept in mind.

I think the Bible article needs to document the Bible much more in an overall literary view, covering the topics such as the self-evident themes, the different groupins, the different testaments (without replacing the corresponding article). The biggest thing is citation within the Bible that documents the characteristics we claim, as this will indirectly give examples to how the Bible shows itself.

In particular the "circulation" section may be unfitting to the biblical point of view of the wiki