Thread:JoePlay/@comment-5175866-20151202225336/@comment-5175866-20151203211749

Hey. Thanks for making this template. I think that in some (perhaps infrequent, but better to have it covered then needing an entirely different solution) some cases that there will not be a second alternative that is more "popular" than another. Here is an example of such,

If we were to have a disambiguation specific to books named John  (it wouldn't be a seperate disambiguation namespace page though) it would redirect to the gosepl of john

"This article is about the Gospel. You may be looking for other uses". In this case the other uses would link to the heading on disambiguation books, as it could refer to 1st John, 2nd John, 3rd john or even the Book of Revelation, since it is sometimes referred to "The Apocalypse of John". The counterexample to my example would be just have Gospel of John and Book of First John (an epistle).

Though it may not be common, I think that it should be required, only when there is not an other uses. If there is "other uses" then some cases there may not be a clearly popular second example.

The other thing that could be added would be a third link to an alternative, but I can see the reason for not adding that because if there were more than 3 it should be linked to disambiguation.

Thanks so much for your help and time (I am saying that because I appreciate it, not just because its apart of your job, and I recall reading that the appreciation is the favorite part of your job). The template looks great. I also renamed it to "Template:RedirectDiffer"

This is an unrelated question, but why is the team you head call "Special Operations", compared to "Community Development, Design and Code" or something. Also I may be messaging you soon (within a week) concerning infoboxes if I cannot figure it out on my own- hopefully some day I will sit down and learn wikitext and JS.