Thread:WOT3000/@comment-5175866-20160717134907

Hi WOT. I am glad to see you are trying to venture farther into this site by writing. I decided to rollback both of your edits to the Archangel article for a couple of reasons.

You added an image of Raphael to the article. While the intent of having an image, is indeed a good one, Raphael is not in what is considered canon on this site. Raphael is an apocryphal being, meaning he is only mentioned in the Apocrypha. This is considered canon by the Catholic church, but for purposes of this wiki we cannot compromise and allow it. There are many reasons when anaylzing the Apocrypha of why it is not considered canon, and though it does contain some history it often contradicts the Bible and itself, being a Bible Wiki we cannot document this.

Second, you added the image in an infobox. Infoboxes are meant to be tables in order to describe basic semantics about the subject of the article. You used the infobox to add a standalone image, which in that case you can simply just insert an image, without the need of an infobox.

Thirdly (this is partially my mistake)- I thought you have added Wikipedia copied content. Upon looking at the history a bit more it seems it has Wikipedia added content from the future. I reverted the edit thinking it had Wikipedia copied that you added, when it already did. Perhaps I can take a few minutes to correct this issue

Thanks for all the work you have done in adding images. I hope this doesn't discourage you from continuing adding images. Be warned though that many paintings are inaccurate depictions of the Bible, so please be mindful of that. In this case a picture of Michael, the only Archangel specifically mentioned as one would be appropiate. For now the articles will remain distinct unless such time where its decided they need to be one.

In Christ,

Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator & Bureaucrat 