Thread:Superdadsuper/@comment-25691483-20171222053000/@comment-25691483-20171222183618

Hi Superdadsuper!

Thank you for your feedback! biblehub.com looks like a fair resource. However, I also find that https://www.blueletterbible.org/ is an exceptional resource, for the following reasons: You may also review their about - https://www.blueletterbible.org/about/about.cfm
 * 1) https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/1/1/t_conc_1001 (interlinear)
 * 2) https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/1/1/t_bibles_1001 (Cross section bibles)
 * 3) https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/1/1/t_corr_1001 (Cross ref scrip)
 * 4) https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/1/1/t_comms_1001 (Commentaries)
 * 5) https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/1/1/t_refs_1001 (Dictionaries)

Disclaimer. blb.org is not affiliated or promoted by Jehovah's Witnesses. Jehovah's Witnesses have their own preferred online Bible Reference library available to the public at https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/. However, this study link is more or less for Jehovah's Witnesses themselves. Only through revelation by God, will one come to know what His Will is. Therefore, you and I both benefit from God's Will in the positions that we are both seated in - You (here) and me (there), or vise versa depending on perspective. As this is a "Disclaimer" section, allow me to speak freely by this somewhat obscure language. However, let me now be clear that I am not speaking as a mouth-piece for Jehovah's Witnesses. I will only glean light on Jehovah's Witnesses as it is appropriate to do so. I do acknowledge that I posses bias behavior and understanding. But, I also understand that there are lines and sections to respect. Had all Christians respected each other throughout history, perhaps we would not have had events like St. Bartholomew's Day massacre and the sub-sequent events that followed.

About me. I love history.

About you. I respect your position. I appreciate this correspondence. I understand your seemingly apprehensiveness to my background by the nature of your writing "Jehova Witness" (As indicated by the red squiggly under the name in the edit section, in contrast to your attention to detail in commentary- and that you have a full section on Yahweh where His name matches that which is in current academia -https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/jehovah).

My intentions. My intentions are to reach out to you and collaborate on possible future edits. Collaborating reduces war. I may or may not contribute-It depends on my position before God how I should move, and it also depends on how God is moving you. I believe that a proper dose of debate is healthy, as long as we maintain respect. Therefore, I will strive to respect your position. I am not seeking a position on your Wiki. I do, however, see that your Wiki is a potential resource. Let me reiterate that I am not speaking as a mouth-piece for Jehovah's Witnesses.

Obscure language. As I am one of Jehovah's Witnesses, I wear their glasses. I also understand that you have your own glasses. My glasses are not better than your glasses. I cannot speak for your glasses, so I cannot presume that your glasses are any better or worse than mine. God has allowed our glasses to be manufactured the way they are and with the intensity that we both suffer/benefit from by wearing our individualised glasses. Therefore, I cannot convince you to see things my way should your glasses not allow you to. It would be of ill conceit for me to force you (by any kind of sword) to see something that you (generally speaking, by higher forces) are not permitted to see. Likewise, I must respect God's Will to reveal to me what I ought/must/should see. I speak from my heart, not as a mouthpiece for Jehovah's Witnesses in this regard.

לֹו יְבָרֶכְךָ יהוה May יהוה bless you, Br-jsosa (talk) 18:36, December 22, 2017 (UTC)