Thread:SouthWriter/@comment-5175866-20150828230358/@comment-5175866-20150830010947

As I said i'm not against using such scholarly references, I just feel like at this stage the concept of Biblicalapedia is in to infant form to deal with that quite yet. As you say yourself, sometimes the writing is a bit to formal and its important that this is not only good studying material for the "infant bible scholar" (as in is a Bible Scholar but not in as near theological detail) as well as the general Christian. I do not wish to have two separate wiki's but rather one unified idea and goal.

At this point in time I am just stating how I feel the wiki should be and am trying to be as upfront and honest as possible with my opinons. Being the current sole admin that's how it will work up, but once you are complete in becoming one then we will need to consult each other, perhaps even on certain things gain the consensus of the community or other groups. As you will find out when I get the background-check there are many other things that I have my agenda/list that will need to be accomplished or discussed before we can get any further. What I see as of now in the terms of including other secondary sources I think perhaps much farther in the future, as I said I think the wiki isn't quite ready for that. We have much to discuss and remember to pray for a clear solution and a vision in how the wiki should be and that above all, the wiki glorifies Christ.

Working with others ideas, and not doing it my own isn't something I am used to and I think God will help me personally in being able to do that. It will be a lesson and a chance for me to grow in Christ I believe though