Thread:Superdadsuper/@comment-24874291-20150215020503/@comment-5175866-20150310221031

This will be my last post on this thread here before I most likely will close it as afterwards you can have further concerns posted on the forum. I think the issue is you need to look at the actual historicity behind the KJV. The KJV you read now is actually not the original KJV. You would eitheir be reading for NKJV or a revised edition from the early 1700's. When Arasamas wrote the original KJV it he lacked some manuscripts for translation and often times he had to make a best guess in some of the verses with a word or two or a verse sometimes added in do to this. Then Aramasas specifically stated that he had made some grammartical mistakes on KJV and lacked some manuscripts.

James White has made a rather extentsive video series on the specifics of refuting KJV only controversy and has particapted in several debates about it. I reccomend the two of you see what he has to say as he looks at the specifics behind KJV only. You will see here within a few minutes to hours the descion on KJV only will have been posted.