Thread:Superdadsuper/@comment-1777104-20151223183315/@comment-5175866-20151223183833

That was just something I edited out. But I see it in other articles and see it is there. The only issue with mentioning languages (which I am not sure what your judgement on this would be) on Etymology sections where it says "from the latin word...." when latin wasn't developed until after biblical times. I am not sure if that sort of thing is appropiate or not, and I am not a huge fan of big etymology sections. My preferred method is just stating what the word means simply, rather than referring to the original root word and the language the word derrived from- this is very similair to what most modern translations do with names (In this case I also cite the verse and the modern translation provides the meaning).

Again that's the way I prefer to do things. Perhaps we can discuss this at our meeting today