Thread:SouthWriter/@comment-5175866-20150828230358

Hi SouthWriter. I want to thank you for your patience in the whole recruiting process, as there was a bit of a misunderstanding that you were actually ready for the background check form! So sorry about that, but sometimes God gives things time rather than it being instant.

I wanted to address a couple of your ideas and your edits as in what I personally feel like should be done as of now and as the sole admin (be in prayer that you and I can see what God's plans are over ours and even when we are in disagreement or difference of opinion that the focus is God's glory) that you have suggested via talk pages or have done

It seems like to me in your talk page comments and edits that you would like to see much more studying from a tertiary level, rather than secondary. By this I am referring to the Bible as the primary source, than there is the secondary study material of the Bible and then there is the tertiary resource that it gains its data from the secondary sources as well as primary. I don't know if this was your intention but a noticed you seem like you would like to quote particular sources and/or add some studying on original language to English and little notes on verses.

What I personally see where the wiki should go is rather than studying the translations of the Bible, quoting other sources or adding notes to the verses themselves do a direct studying of the Bible in the common language of the wiki in more of a paraphrase and stating what the Bible says. I'm not against these other sources or translation but I feel like this wiki should be an independent source that gains its content in the relationship of paraphrasing and compiled information directly with Scripture. I also have noticed in your references you have added little notes instead of verses all by themselves.

What I have been intending to do (but haven't because of Wikia's recent security issues) is switching that over to be more of a verse inserting system. I am planning on installing reftagger as well as changing the insert buttons on the editor to "Verses" and "Verses List" rather than references. I find this important in showing how solely we would like to base everything here of the Bible itself. Scholarly references may be useful, but don't know if they can work real well at this time where this wiki has a huge amount of direct attribution to the Bible.

As of little translations I am more for consulting the english language sources in the "common-being" of Scripture. Rather than consulting a specific version or language to just state the meaning of the verse that God has intended in it. To some degree the meaning of the words of the Bible is not something that can be entirely existent within a language. With specific name translations, I would lean more for when the Bible states the meaning to state it but not provide a transliteration. We have much to discuss and to pray and again make sure to pray for a vision rooted in our mission that isn't about human ideas but in the end spreading the Gospel, and aiding those who are saved in reading the Bible.

Thanks, Superdadsuper, Biblicalapedia Administrator and Bureaucrat 