Thread:Superdadsuper/@comment-20637203-20140920165806/@comment-20637203-20140921161154

I've been thinking about it and I think even saying Jesus "challenged" Jewish law is wrong. He never challenged the law itself, He challenged the way they were serving the law at the time. He came to fulfill the law, pure and simple. He was challenged by the pharisees many times, but they never could "trap" Him, which is what they were trying to do. He never said one shouldn't adhere to the law. He did, however, criticize the "ways" they were following the law. The money changers at the temple is a perfect example. And, "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and give unto God what is God's." He's not challenging the law, just the way it is followed. Does that make sense? Words matter on stuff like this, especially for someone new to the bible. If I'm overstepping my bounds, please, let me know.

It wouldn't hurt to have a Forum Board just for debating things like this, if there isn't one already.